Practitioners in the field of labor or Human Resources (HR), as well as managers and executive officers of companies, are aware that an employee may only be dismissed for cause. Disciplinary actions, including dismissal from work, must comply with both substantive and procedural due process. Substantive due process requires a valid cause for the dismissal. For procedural due process, outlined below, an interesting question is this: is there a minimum period that must be given to the employee to answer the show-cause notice?
We recently received a query as to how many days should be given to the employee to answer the show-cause notice. We find this query “interesting” because there is no provision in the Labor Code, or its Implementing Rules and Regulations, which spells out a specific period. What’s more interesting, however, is that the Supreme Court has construed this period to mean five (5) days from receipt of the show cause notice. [See updated discussion on Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination Cases]
The procedural requirements, as summarized by the Supreme Court, are:
(A) The first written notice to be served on the employees should contain the specific causes or grounds for termination against them, and a directive that the employees are given the opportunity to submit their written explanation within a reasonable period. “Reasonable opportunity” under the Omnibus Rules means every kind of assistance that management must accord to the employees to enable them to prepare adequately for their defense. This should be construed as a period of at least five (5) calendar days from receipt of the notice to give the employees an opportunity to study the accusation against them, consult a union official or lawyer, gather data and evidence, and decide on the defenses they will raise against the complaint. Moreover, in order to enable the employees to intelligently prepare their explanation and defenses, the notice should contain a detailed narration of the facts and circumstances that will serve as basis for the charge against the employees. A general description of the charge will not suffice. Lastly, the notice should specifically mention which company rules, if any, are violated and/or which among the grounds under Art. 282 is being charged against the employees.
(B) After serving the first notice, the employers should schedule and conduct a hearing or conference wherein the employees will be given the opportunity to: (1) explain and clarify their defenses to the charge against them; (2) present evidence in support of their defenses; and (3) rebut the evidence presented against them by the management. During the hearing or conference, the employees are given the chance to defend themselves personally, with the assistance of a representative or counsel of their choice. Moreover, this conference or hearing could be used by the parties as an opportunity to come to an amicable settlement.
(C) After determining that termination of employment is justified, the employers shall serve the employees a written notice of termination indicating that: (1) all circumstances involving the charge against the employees have been considered; and (2) grounds have been established to justify the severance of their employment.
- Twin-Notice Rule and Procedural Requirements in Employment Termination Proceedings - June 3, 2020
- When Travel Pass is Needed for Interzonal Travel during Community Quarantine - June 1, 2020
- Can Companies Compel Employees to Work during the General Community Quarantine (GCQ) and Impose Disciplinary Sanctions - May 29, 2020
Good morning. Im working is account manager in distribution company. i was a probitionary period for 6 months. I didnt meet my quarterly target for two concencutive quarter. My superior told me that may last day of work is on dec 8 2016 verbaly with out documentation. I didnt recieve my 13 month pay and my last salary. Would like to know if tama po ba ginawa nila sakin naka hold sa knila ang 13month pay ko and ung last salary. Looking forward to your response. Thank you
hi
i would like to seek advice or answr from ..
i am an empolyee of a cooperative for almost 4 years now. And just last month i receive a memo stating that i am under 30 days of preventive suspension undr investigation in compliance of a due process .. And now after the 30 days of my preventive suspension, the employer gave me another memo stating of the anomalous and unlawful conduct and activities that has been filed to me and they want me to explain the reason why , with in 24 hours and that i am still not allowed to report to work provided that they will pay me of the extension of my suspension .. 1 wk aftr i submit my explanation, the employer then now gave me a memo. a notice of termination due to anomalous. which is so hard for me to accept. The memo of my suspension states that aftr the investigation, the grievance committee will notify me for the next administrative hearing but after that 30days , instead of admin.hearing they serve me the notice of termination.
My question is, is it ok that they didnt called me for the admin hearing? am i still qualify to rcv my 13th mo. pay, my last salary, cash gft or other bonuses and a separation pay? because until now i ddnt rcv any of that. the management says that the 13th mo. and salary has been hold by the bod and that they did not tackle abwt the status of my cash gift if i am able to rcv or not. My last day of work before i am suspenped is in the middle of november 2016.. hope u can help me with it. thanks
Magtatanong lang naman po ako kung may mahahabol pa po ba ako sa aking kompanyang pinagtrabahuhan ng almost 7 years and 8months. Naterminate po ako last December 2, 2016 dahil sa grounds of Tampering which is automatic termination ang nkalagay sa Code of Conduct ng Company namin. Aminado naman po ako sa ginagawa ko. Nag tamper po kasi ako resibo ng hotel which is allowed sa amin eh 1,3K eh ang aktwal hotel expense ko lng naman po during nung nag Davao po ako eh 800 pesos lang. Kaya ko naisipan mag tamper which is Mali naman talaga po. Yung po kasing bagong President ng Company eh foreigner na po kaya hindi napakiusapan. Automatic termination na which is sabi ng iba kung kasama eh sana pinag force resignation na lang daw dpat nila ako. Kaso TERMINATION po ang ginawa sa akin. Wala po akong nakuha sahod maski yung isang linggong ipinasok ko. Saka wala din po akong Certificate of Employment na ibingay sa akin. Kaya po ngayon ay hirap na hirap po akong makakuha ng trabaho. Breadwinner pa naman ako ng family ko. Sana may nakapg advise naman po sa akin kung may mahahabol pa po ba ako. Aminado naman po ako sa kamalian ko. Salamat sa mga sasagot po. Thanks!
need thoughts on my case … can you be accused of theft kung wala namang nawala? my co employee accused me of stealing wherein wala namang nawala sa kanya though nakita sa cctv na 2x kong hinawakan ang bag nya pero wala namang nawala. sa admin hearing walang kasamang legal rep ng ofc, 2 hr and ung head namin nung accuser. k was given a termination letter which i need to step out of office same day. tama po ba iyon? hindi naman nakita sa cctv kung binuksan ko ang bag and tama ba na same day akong paalisin? i was in the company for 6 years walang bad record, i even had multiple awards, all my records were good.
Hi,
I just want to ask po if allowed bang mag add ng evidence si HR outside dun sa naka state NTE (Notice to Explain) that they served? Di po ba na yung NTE is expected to contain all the necessary details, solid evidences, and narrative stating the alleged violation? They reserved the on Feb 13 and went back to me after 2 weeks and invited me for a hearing and they said there’s a new evidence against me. im hoping that you help me with this. Thank you.
Good Day, May I ask if the employer can serve Termination of contract without giving the first notice of preventive suspension and not conduct hearing or conference for the employee to be heard or explain his/her side.. i hope you to answer my question, thank you.
Got suspended on Dec 19,2016 due to tardiness. Receive a final written warning on Dec 29,2016. Admin hearing on Jan 5,2017 , I told them na I’ll pass the resignation letter na lang and so I did the next day (Jan6). They told me that whichever comes first (result of admin hearing & 30 days render). Last January 12,2017 they told me to go to the hr/er office after my shift. Pagpunta ko po dun sinabihan na ako na yung araw na rin yun ang last day ko at terminated na ako.
First Question: May possibility ba na makakuha ako ng separation since 1 yr & 4 naman ako sa company & regular na ako.
Second Question: Pwede ko bang e reklamo sa DOLE/NLRC dahil hindi umabot ng one month ang pag terminate sa akin? Nabasa ko po kasi sa ibang article na before e terminate ang employee dapat ay may ma receive sila na letter indicating her/his last day of work. Please advise.
Thanks,
LC
Hi! Is a termination letter valid if the letter itself has no HR signature but all the other things that you mentioned are presented?
I have a query. I hope someone could enlighten me.
Can an employer terminate an employee because of not submitting a leave form because the employee has no leave credits left? The reason for the absence is illness like flu. Hence, the employee was marked absent in all of his classes on the specific period of absences. The employee has already sent a written explanation of the absences. The absences were made January 16 to February 3 (not consecutively made). Then the written notice was made April 10 and received April 25. Can this be a ground for termination? Thank you for taking time answering this.
what if yung hrd ay pinagsabi sa ibang tao ang DA na ibinaba saken?
ano po ang pwede kong ireklamo ?