Primer on the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995)

There’s an alarming rise in reported complaints of nude photos, mostly of women, being posted without the consent of the subjects in social networking sites such as facebook. There’s also a proliferation of sex scandals and sex videos. One of the usual complaints filed against the offenders is under Republic Act No. 9995, also known as the “Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009“. Here’s a primer on this anti-voyeurism law.

What is the definition of “photo or video voyeurism”?

It is the act of taking photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual act or any similar activity or of capturing an image of the private area of a person or persons without the latter’s consent, under circumstances in which such person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or the act of selling, copying, reproducing, broadcasting, sharing, showing or exhibiting the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or similar activity through VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and similar means or device without the written consent of the person/s involved, notwithstanding that consent to record or take photo or video coverage of same was given by such person’s.

That’s a very long definition. Please enumerate the specific acts prohibited and punished under the “Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009”.

1. To take photo or video coverage of a person or group of persons performing sexual act or any similar activity or to capture an image of the private area of a person/s such as the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast without the consent of the person/s involved and under circumstances in which the person/s has/have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

2. To copy or reproduce, or to cause to be copied or reproduced, such photo or video or recording of sexual act or any similar activity with or without consideration. It is immaterial if consent to record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given by such person/s.

3. To sell or distribute, or cause to be sold or distributed, such photo or video or recording of sexual act, whether it be the original copy or reproduction thereof. It is immaterial if consent to record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given by such person/s.

4. To publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or broadcast, whether in print or broadcast media, or show or exhibit the photo or video coverage or recordings of such sexual act or any similar activity through VCD/DVD, internet, cellular phones and other similar means or device. It is immaterial if consent to record or take photo or video coverage of the same was given by such person/s.

The first act speaks of “circumstances in which a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy”, what does this mean?

It means circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that:

  1. he/she could disrobe in privacy, without being concerned that an image or a private area of the person was being captured; or
  2. a private area of the person would not be visible to the public, regardless of whether that person is in a public or private place.

What do you mean by “private area of a person”?

It means the naked or undergarment clad genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast of an individual.

If there’s an undergarment (e.g., brief or panty) covering the private parts, is this still covered by the law?

Yes. Based on the definition above, the genitals, pubic area, buttocks or female breast of an individual may be naked or clad with undergarment.

What is the meaning of “capture”?

With respect to an image, it means to videotape, photograph, film, record by any means, or broadcast.

What if the other person was aware of and consented to the taking of the photograph?

Even if there was consent to the taking of the photo, if there is no consent to the sharing or exhibition, then the offending party would still be liable.

What do you mean by “broadcast”?

“Broadcast” means to make public, by any means, a visual image with the intent that it be viewed by a person or persons.

What if the photo shows the breasts of a man, is this covered by the law?

No. The law only covers female breasts.

If the photo shows only the side of a female breast, without the nipple, is this still covered by the law?

Yes. The term “female breast” includes “any portion of the female breast”.

What is the penalty for committing any of the prohibited acts?

The court has the discretion to impose:

  1. Imprisonment of not less that three (3) years but not more than seven (7) years, or
  2. A fine of not less than P100,000 but not more than P500,000, or
  3. Both.

Are these materials admissible in evidence?

As a general rule, no. The record, photo or video, or copy thereof, obtained or secured by any person in violation of this law shall not be admissible in evidence in any judicial, quasi-judicial, legislative or administrative hearing or investigation.

However, any peace officer may secure an order of the court to use the record or any copy thereof as evidence in any civil, criminal investigation or trial of the crime of photo or video voyeurism. The written order shall only be issued or granted upon written application and the examination under oath or affirmation of the applicant and the witnesses he/she may produce, and upon showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that photo or video voyeurism has been committed or is about to be committed, and that the evidence to be obtained is essential to the conviction of any person for, or to the solution or prevention of such, crime.

Atty.Fred

17 thoughts on “Primer on the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009 (RA 9995)

  1. Avatarlove

    hello what can i do if have someone blackmail me my private videos on cam he posted on social media with out my permission ,i dont know he record that videos while where having fun on cam and he said i will return his money given to me. please need advice .thank you

    Reply
  2. Avatarsheng

    what if the person is performing in public and suffered a wardrobe malfunction making a full exposure of her breast. And somebody in the audience videotaped it using his mobile phone and were asked to delete it immediately and refused to do so. Can he be sue for RA 9995??

    Reply
  3. AvatarAlegna

    Minor po ako and meron po kasing guy na nakachat ko lang sa social media aware naman po ako na nagsend ako sakanya ng nudes ko (breast only) hanggang sa after ilang months tumino na ako and sabi ko sakanya na tigilan na nya ako pero binablackmail na nya ako na isesend nya sa mama ko kaya binlock ko sya sa acc ng mama ko pero ayaw nya parin ako tigilan gusto pa po nya ako makipag vc sakanya showing my breast pero umaayaw po ako. This friday lang po August 10 nagchat sya ulit saakin na isesend na daw nya talaga and nung nakita ko p sa recent searches sa FB nakalagay dun yung naka search yung acc ng papa ko kaya nag delete agad ako ng acc pero pwede pa naman ata maopen. I screenshot some important details here and isesend ko sakanya pero kung di parin sya titigil I will immediately report this sa police. Ayokong malaman to ng parents ko kaya natatakot ako atsaka baka nagsumbong kasi ako sa police baka maisabi sa parents ko.

    Reply
  4. AvatarKasper

    Meron po kasi akong kaibigan at sinampahan siya ng kaso RA 9995 which is hindi niya naman intensyon na I public o Ikalat ang video at pag kaka alam ko ay private file nila mag jowa yung video. Ang nangyari po kasi nanakawan siya sa bahay nila at kasama ng nanakawan yung memory card niya na nalalaman ng video nila. Which is hindi naman totally malaswa ang video at nakikita lang na nakatilakbong sila ng kumot habang nagsesex at wala naman na kitang malaswang bahagi ng katawan ng babae sa video. Nangyari is yung mother ng babae sinampahan yung kaibigan ko. Kahit kumalat o lumabas yung video pero walang malaswa sa video at walang na kitang private part ng babae at hindi klaro at medyo madilim naman ang video. Masasampahan parin ba ng kaso yung kaibigan ko kahit wala naman maselan bahagi ng katawan ng babae ang nakita sa video.

    Reply
  5. AvatarJes

    Hello, i hope this site is still active. I will really appreciate if someone gives his/her responce for my concern.
    The case is My brother in law is asking my sister to take a photo of her breast and privitate, my sister refuse saying she has a period which is true but his husband gets mad and so to avoid quarrel she obey it.
    The second time his husband ordered to take a photo again it took her hours to do so since she’s at work resulting that they had a big quarrel, accusing her that she has an affair with some else and now they are about to separate. Can we file against my brother in law?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.