Results of the 2007 Philippine Bar Exams

Leave a reply | Related posts at the end of article

There are rumors that the results of the 2007 bar exams will be released in February 2008 (while others say it’s March). In the days to come, there will be more “rumors” as to when the 2007 results will be released. These rumors only add to the examinee’s agony of waiting for the bar results. So, we will try to provide updates here and post the results upon release. Good luck and God bless to all 2007 bar examinees! (Should the site traffic become a problem, please also check the updates at Atty-at-Work). Update: LIST OF SUCCESSFUL EXAMINEES here.

Writ of Habeas Data: Questions and Answers

4 Replies | Related posts at the end of article

A writ of habeas data a remedy available to any person whose right to privacy in life, liberty or security is violated or threatened by an unlawful act or omission of a public official or employee, or of a private individual or entity engaged in the gathering, collecting or storing of data or information regarding the person, family, home and correspondence of the aggrieved party.

Continue reading →

Annulment in the Philippines: Questions and Answers (Part 3)

193 Replies | Related posts at the end of article

My fiancee and I secured a marriage license, but no marriage ceremony was ever celebrated. I learned, however, that my “wife” is already using my surname in her documents, including her passport. Am I considered as “married”?

No. A marriage license is valid only for 120 days, and any marriage contracted after that period is null and void. A woman cannot use his putative “husband’s” surname in the absence of a valid marriage. [See: Grounds for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage]

Continue reading →

Branches of the Philippine Government: Separation of Powers

7 Replies | Related posts at the end of article

The Philippines is a democratic and republican state. As a republican state, sovereignty resides in the People and all government authority emanates from them (Constitution, Art. III, Sec. 1). “A Republican form of government rests on the conviction that sovereignty should reside in the people and that all government authority must emanate from them. It abhors the concentration of power on one or a few, cognizant that power, when absolute, can lead to abuse, but it also shuns a direct and unbridled rule by the people, a veritable kindling to the passionate fires of anarchy. Our people have accepted this notion and decided to delegate the basic state authority to principally three branches of government — the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judiciary – each branch being supreme in its own sphere but with constitutional limits and a firm tripod of checks and balances .”

Continue reading →

Last Will and Testament in the Philippines: Basic Discussion

81 Replies | Related posts at the end of article

The settlement of a person’s estate after his/her death, based on our experience, is potentially one of the more bitter litigations. It’s never good to see relatives fighting each other. Some persons, with the intent of controlling the disposition of his/her properties after his/her death (and hopefully prevent fighting among his/her heirs over the properties left), prepare a “last will and testament”. Let’s have a brief discussion on this matter.

Continue reading →

Love and Law

1 Reply | Related posts at the end of article

It may seem improper to talk about love in a legal forum, particularly considering that among the most popular articles relate to annulment, legal separation and divorce. Still, Valentines, February 14, is just around the corner and there could be no serious objections why we could not talk about this “gentle and universal emotion.” Besides, even the Supreme Court had occasions to talk about love —

Continue reading →

The Mendiola Massacre: What Happened according to Jurisprudence

Leave a reply | Related posts at the end of article

Today, 22 January 2008, marks the 21st anniversary of what has been dubbed as the “Mendiola Massacre.” An entire generation may not be aware of, and many could have already forgotten, what transpired on that date. In the words of the Supreme Court: “People may have already forgotten the tragedy that transpired on January 22, 1987. It is quite ironic that then, some journalists called it a Black Thursday, as a grim reminder to the nation of the misfortune that befell twelve (12) rallyists. But for most Filipinos now, the Mendiola massacre may now just as well be a chapter in our history books. For those however, who have become widows and orphans, certainly they would not settle for just that. They seek retribution for the lives taken that will never be brought back to life again.”

Continue reading →