Reproductive Health Bill: Fact Sheet and Explanatory Note

[Note: This is the Fact Sheet from the Committee on Health on House Bill No. 5043 [full text],  in substitution to HB Nos. 17,  812,  2753 & 3970. Introduced by Reps. Edcel C. Lagman, Janette L. Garin, Narciso D.Santiago III, Mark Llandro Mendoza, Ana Theresia Hontiveros-Baraquel, Eleandro Jesus F. Madrona. The full text of the explanatory note of  Rep. Edcel Lagman’s House Bill No. 17,  one of the substituted bills, is also reproduced below.]

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH AND POPULATION DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2008

OBJECTIVE/S:

  • To uphold and promote respect for life, informed choice, birth spacing and responsible parenthood in conformity with internationally recognized human rights standards.
  • To guarantee universal access to medically-safe, legal and quality reproductive health care services and relevant information even as it prioritizes the needs of women and children.

KEY PROVISIONS:

  • Mandates the Population Commission, to be an attached agency of the Department of Health, to be the central planning, coordinating, implementing and monitoring body for effective implementation of this Act.
  • Provides for the creation of an enabling environment for women and couples to make an informed choice regarding the family planning method that is best suited to their needs and personal convictions.
  • Provides for a maternal death review in LGUs, national and local government hospitals and other public health units to decrease the incidence of maternal deaths.
  • Ensures the availability of hospital-based family planning methods such as tubal ligation, vasectomy and intrauterine device insertion in all national and local government hospitals, except in specialty hospitals.
  • Considers hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, injectables and other allied reproductive health products and supplies under the category of essential medicines and supplies to form part of the National Drug Formulary and to be included in the regular purchase of essential medicines and supplies of all national and local hospitals and other government health units.
  • Provides for a Mobile Health Care Service in every Congressional District to deliver health care goods and services.
  • Provides Mandatory Age-appropriate Reproductive Health Education starting from Grade 5 to Fourth Year High School to develop the youth into responsible adults.
  • Mandates the inclusion of the topics on breastfeeding and infant nutrition as essential part of the information given by the City or Municipal Office of the Family Planning to all applicants for marriage license.
  • Mandates no less than 10% increase in the honoraria of community-based volunteer workers, such as the barangay health workers, upon successful completion of training on the delivery of reproductive health care services.
  • Penalizes the violator of this Act from one month to six months imprisonment or a fine ranging from ten thousand to fifty thousand pesos or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the Court.

Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Quezon City, Metro Manila
FOURTEENTH CONGRESS
FIRST REGULAR SESSION

HOUSE BILL NO. 17

Introduced by HONORABLE EDCEL C. LAGMAN

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The present population of the country of 88.7 million has galloped from 60.7 million 17 years ago. This makes the Philippines the 12th most populous nation in the world today.The Filipino women’s fertility rate of 3.05% is at the upper bracket of 206 countries. With four babies born every minute, the population is expected to balloon to an alarming 160 million in 2038.

It is worth noting, however, that available studies, data and statistics show that the Filipinos are responsive to having smaller-sized families through free choice of family planning methods:

  • a. The desired fertility rate of Filipino women is 2.5 children per woman. However, the actual total fertility rate is 3.5 or a difference of one child because of the lack of information and absence of access to family planning. The current unmet need for contraceptives for example is 23.15% for poor women and 13.6% for women who are not poor (2003 National Demographic and Health Survey)
  • b. 61% of currently married women do not want additional children (2003 National Demographic and Health Survey)
  • c. 50.6% of the youth want to have only two children (2002 Young Adult Fertility and Sexuality Survey)
  • d. 97% of all Filipinos believe it is important to have the ability to control one’s fertility or to plan one’s family. It is significant to note that 87% of the total respondents are Roman Catholic (February 2004 Pulse Asia Survey)
  • e. Nearly nine in ten Filipinos or 86% say that candidates for elective positions who advocate a program for women’s health should be supported while only 2% say they should be rejected and 12% are undecided on the matter;
  • f. 82% say that candidates in favor of couples’ free choice of family planning methods should be supported while only 3% think otherwise and 15% are undecided;
  • g. 82% of Filipinos consider candidates supporting a law or measure on population issues worthy of their voltes while only 3% say such candidates should not be backed at the polls and 15% are undecided;
  • h. 83% of Filipinos say they are in favor of candidates who support the allocation of goverment funds for family planning while only 2% say they are not and 15% are undecided; and
  • i. A mere 8% of Filipinos believe that a candidate’s championing of family planning issues will spell that candidate’s defeat at the polls.
  • j. In July 1991, the Social Weather Stations conducted a survey that revealed that 97% of Filipinos want to have the ability to control their fertility and plan their families.

Notwithstanding these findings that favor smaller-sized families, this bill is not a population control measure with the sole objective of limiting population growth. It provides for population development that aims to:

  • (a) help couples/parents achieve their desired fertility size in the context of responsible parenthood;
  • (b) improve reproductive health of individuals and contribute to decreased maternal mortality rate, infant mortality and early child mortality;
  • (c) reduce incidence of teenage pregnancy and other reproductive health problems; and
  • (d) contribute to policies that will assist government to achieve a favorable balance between population and distribution, economic activities and the environment.

This measure is not coercive. It gives couples the freedom to decide whether or not to plan their families or space or limit their children. Those who decide to plan their families also have the freedom to choose what method of contraception is best suited for them. The so called “two child policy” is voluntary, not compulsory; suggestive, not coercive; and absolutely not punitive. It is not even a policy. It is a suggested ideal or norm.

Accordingly, this bill seeks to provide the enabling environment for couples and individuals to enjoy the basic right to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have the information, education, and access to safe, effective, affordable and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice.

This proposed law aims to uphold and promote the four pillars of population and development enunciated by no less than President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo herself in her statement of support for the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) namely: (1) responsible parenthood, (2) informed choice, (3) birth spacing, and (4) respect for life.

It should be clarified, however, that this bill does not only protect the life of the unborn from the moment of implantation but that of the mother as well. Hence, the bill seeks to promote the reproductive health of women basically through massive and sustained information campaign on reproductive health rights, care, services and facilities coupled with universal access to all methods of family planning ranging from the natural to the modern which are medically safe and legally permissible. In the event they fail to prevent pregnancy and resort to abortion, they shall be provided with appropriate health and medical care. Despite the provision for humane and compassionate management of post abortion complications, this bill continues to proscribe and penalize abortion which is a crime under the Revised Penal Code.

To contribute to the empowerment and responsible behavior of the youth, this proposed legislation provides for age-appropriate reproductive health and sexuality education that may be initiated by parents at house, and shall be sustained and complemented by formal education in school.

An effective reproductive health education does not only instill consciousness of freedom of choice but responsible exercise of one’s rights. According to the United Nations Population Fund: “It has been, repeatedly shown that reproductive health education leads to responsible behavior, higher levels of abstinence, later initiation of sexuality, higher use of contraception, and fewer sexual partners, These good effeds are even greater when parents can talk honestly with their children about sexual and reproductive matters.”

To guarantee the right of all persons to a full range of information on family planning methods, services and facilities and to ensure their access to an equally full range of medically safe and effective family planning methods at an appropriate time and by competent and adequately trained persons,the bill mandates  the Commission on Population (POPCOM) to be the central planning, coordinating, implementing and monitoring body for the comprehensive and integrated policy on reproductive health and population development. Section 5 of the bill specifies the functions of POPCOM as the lead agency in the implementation of the “Reproductive Health, Responsible Parenthood and Population Development Act of 2007”.

This proposed Act doses not only seek to protect and promote reproductive health and rights and to empower couples, individuals, more particularly women, and the youth, but it also aims to improve the quality of life of the people in general. Studies show that rapid population growth exacerbates poverty while poverty spawns rapid population growth. Consider the following:

  • The Family Income and Exfenditures Surveys by the National Statistics Office (NSO) from 1985-2000 disclose that 57.3% of families having many children are poor but only 15.7% of families having two children are poor.
  • Large family size is associated with negative determinant of school participation and poor health and survival rates among children. (Orbeta, Population and the Fight Against Poverty, 2003)
  • The prevalence of child labor rises, and school attendance falls, with the number of children in the family (Raymundo, 2004). Moreover,the odds of a child becoming underweight and stunted are greater if he/she belongs to a household with 5 or more members (FNRI 1998). This partly explains why poverty tends to be transmitted and sustained from one generation to the next.
  • According to the UN Population Fund 2002 Report, “lower birth rates and slower population growth over the last three decades have contributed faster economic progress in a number of developing countries.”
  • Moreover,the same Report disclosed that fertility declines accounted for 1/5th of the economic growth in East Asia between 1960 and 1995. Additionally, it showed that countries that invest in health, including reproductive health and family planning, and in education and women’s development register slower population growth and faster economic growth.

A consistent and coherent national population policy along with sound monetary and fiscal policies and good governance could propel our people toward sustainable human development.

Accordingly, approval of this measure is earnestly sought.

(See also: Full text of House Bill No. 5043 (Reproductive Health and Population Development Act of 2008)

Atty.Fred

26 thoughts on “Reproductive Health Bill: Fact Sheet and Explanatory Note

  1. CL

    i think dapat na talaga i-control ang population natin. masikip na ang world guys. sana isipin rin natin ang susunod pang salinlahi. 😀

    Reply
  2. ehctir2009

    mga hindi nag-iisip yong mga taong sinisii ang pagkakamali sa gobyerno.in the first place sino ba ang mga nagluklok sa kanila sa posItion?hindi ba kayo,mga taong nadala sa salapi,kaya sisihin niyo. sisihin niyo ang mga makasarili ninyong mga disisyon.
    reproductive health bill is good,as a matter of fact we just dont see the real point of our government officials.gumising kayo,nasa krisis na tayo ngayon,hahayaan niyo bang maranasan din nga mga sumusunod na henerasyon ang hirap na naranasan natin ngayon?kaya masmabuti pa na hindi na nila mamulatan ang mundo mo, ang mundo mong makasalanan.
    sige eto sulatan mo ako. ehctir2009@yahoo.com

    Reply
  3. yl_marie

    PLS. READ THIS!!!
    hello to all, im a new user of this site and i found it interesting to discuss things such as reproductive health bill,and let me share this to you im a student at our first subject last monday which is politics discuss this RH bill there is debate between affirmative and negative and it looks like affirmative side wins, but you know for me RH bill is not the answer to our problems frankly i dont want our government to pass this bill for such other reasons. and i see some errors at this bill,
    first they are pointing out that philippines is over populated but the question is, is it true that phil. is really over populated? well according to our records there are still 4 percent of unclassified lands in our country,49 percent classified but not all of this land is in right use if only our government will be able to control this lands in proper use we are not going to face this problems,
    second they say that sex education is going to teach for those children in grade 3-4 and 5 to 4th yr. highschool there is no problem about that but this people should make sure that this minor will not be curious about sex and they will not be tempt to try this, 3rd we filipinos are still in stage of being conservatives and i think this bill will erase it like what this guy/gal says our government will produce contraceptives this will be free nationwide and everyone is allowed to use this methods, even thou minors and parents will not have their right to teach and control in some way their childrens if they will be the first to teach themselves.
    4th protitutions, pornography, this bill does not say anything about this we know its a broad matter they should include it did they think about it? well they better think about it.
    another SEC.11 of RH Bill says :
    SEC. 11. Mobile Health Care Service. -Each Congressional District shall be provided with a van to be known as the Mobile Health Care Service (MHOS) to deliver health care goods and services to its constituents, more particularly to the poor and needy, as well as disseminate knowledge and information on reproductive health: Provided, That reproductive health education shall be conducted by competent and adequately trained persons preferably reproductive health care providers: Provided, further, That the full range of family planning methods, both natural and modern, shall be promoted.
    and this is what i want to say “I HOPE SO” the government will be spending money for this project?…hmmm…i dont think so! how about DSWD according to GMA 7 IMBESTIGADOR there are only 4 or 3 shelthers in metro manila and its not enough bec. of the funds maybe there is a question playing on you minds “what is the connection of DSWD in our dicussion?” well according to sec.21 3rd paragraph of this
    3. Refuse to provide reproductive health care services to an abused minor, whose abused condition is certified by the proper official or personnel of the Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) or to duly DSWD-certified abused pregnant minor on whose case no parental consent is necessary. if ever this bill will be pass expect for more of this kind of cases stated above, how will DSWD handle this cases if our present problems are not fixed already its a big question.
    i know we should not include the church in this topic but according to them we should be proud because according to the international record of population we can see that the only country that maintains the balance of population is the philippines its a perfect pyramid we should be proud.
    another, everyone knows singapore abortion and RH BILL is implemented to their country but see after years their population reduce they almost fall down and know what the minister of their country says sorry to them for implementing this law during his reign for their country is suffering from having a small population and he told everyone “please produce more” they implement now the law of having 6 and more children per family.see. (facts from our symposiums)

    another “THERE IS LIFE STARTING FROM FERTILITY” its true people say theres no life on fertility but there is , they say its only blood but think about it life starts from the beginning by the time the sperm and egg cell united there is life.

    and have you ever think that what if one time by the time your mother are pregnant to you and they think of aborting you bec. they do belive theres no life by 3months of bearing a child, do you think
    it is moral you should better think about it.

    NOTE: its my opinion violent reaction is accepted but dont forget to reflect after reading this.???

    Reply
  4. JarodVIII

    Why do we think that we are not overpopulated just because there are still lands that are not occupied?

    It is already occupied, by the trees and the animals, remember that human beings are not the only ones created by God.

    We need other creatures to live, that’s why they are created before the human beings, to support our existence. Where will we get our oxygen? Who will provide our food. They don’t come pre-packaged and are readily available from the grocery.

    The sex drive is there. Maybe you are out of touch but the young are curious, just like when we were young. It is up to the parents how to teach their children. Knowledge liberates anyone from ignorance. One would try something if they don’t know what would happen.

    Reply
  5. mendicant_bias

    Before I begin my deconstructive statements, let me first say that from the way those against the bill are writing their comments, I can infer that they are ignorant of many things, including grammar. Before you even try to comment on large issues, consider your own issues first.

    To start things off, “Not all that is moral is right; not all that is right is moral.”

    For those screaming abortion, READ. PLEASE. DON’T BE STUPID. The bill states that even if it is passed, abortion is still considered a criminal act. However, it makes provisions for POST (READ PLEASE, POST MEANING AFTER IF YOU’RE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THAT) ABORTION CARE. That’s more pro-life than a stupid priest screaming sermons, because he’s just babbling. All talk, no go.

    For those screaming against artificial contraceptives, all I can say is, LOOK UP CONTRACEPTION. You’re not killing on contraception; you’re preventing life from forming. Your argument that it’s tantamount to murder is totally stupid, completely off. Before commenting on something, make sure you fully comprehend it.

    Let me quote this:
    “The specific SOLUTIONS ABOUT THIS ISSUE is simple.

    -first of all this country doesn’t and wont need corruption!
    -the money to be spent for this bill should be used for a PROPER and for a “MORAL” education of our people.
    -they should always tell the people about its TRUE EFFECTS in our country and to US.
    -INSTEAD OF KILLING THE POPULATION GROWTH, IT IS MORE LIKELY TO USE IT FOR ITS FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS!

    EFFECTS OF THE RH BILL

    -the DISSOLUTION and Removal of the SIGNIFICANCE and IMPORTANCE of a proper family and matrimony.
    -increase of PROSTITUTION and ABUSES!
    -the loss of moral values or virtues towards our youth.
    -women will loose their socio-cultural pregnancy and motherhood as to men.
    – the consideration of the/our body ONLY as SEX OBJECTS!
    -INCREASE in homosexuality
    -Euthanasia of the Philippines
    -more killings
    -DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER!”

    All I can say is, how stupid. No country needs or wants corruption, but we have corruption, and bad. Not to mention that statement has no connection to the bill. About morality, again, not all that is moral is right. Look up the Inquisition; the Church says it is moral, even though it tortured people and executed more than we have. True effects, you say? They did say it, only you’re too stupid to comprehend it. Killing population growth? Do some research! We have almost the same land area as Arizona in the U.S., yet we have 15 times the population! Guess who’s more developed? How stupid of you to think that we are stopping population growth when we ARE already overpopulated! If you tell us to keep on multiplying, that is tantamount to putting more people on the streets, hence throwing more lives to the grave for no reason, hence MORE ANTI-LIFE than anyone else. YOU INADVERTENTLY MURDER MORE PEOPLE.

    The effects. Wow. Proper family, matrimony, and increase in prostitution. Are you stupid? If couples abstain from sex, the man is more likely to look for other women, because the truth is, what sets us apart from other animals is emotion. Sex, is not merely reproduction to us, but it is also an expression of feelings, of desire, of love, and other deep emotions; you can’t stop it. The only thing you can do is make sure it doesn’t become a problem. Again, homosexuality? Are you dumb? Did you even read the bill? The bill has no connection to homosexuality whatsoever. Euthanasia? This bill can help PREVENT it, for Christ’s sake! How many less people will suffer from poor economic, and therefore living, conditions, as well as poor post-abortion health, thanks to this bill if it is passed! DEMOGRAPHIC WINTER. DAMN STUPID; IF I GO DOWN TO YOUR LEVEL THEN I WOULD DEFINE OUR DEMOGRAPHIC STATUS AS A DEMOGRAPHIC SCORCHING, OR TOO MANY PEOPLE! USE YOUR HEAD! RESEARCH AND COMPARE DAMMIT!

    Plus, about the Church. They are hypocritical. The less people here, the less that give donations to them, and then they will be unable to live their opulent lives. While majority of their congregations work hard, some even not having much to live on, they simply preach misunderstood verses, and get paid big-time for it. Hypocrites! They want more people to donate to them, regardless if they ruin the nation in doing so!

    Reply
  6. iamwczard

    i am condemning the principles of reproductive health because it is against morality and the standards or reasons behind the building of the concepts with regard RHB is unreasonable… perhaps oo sa malaking epekto ang laki ng population sa pagusbong ng isang bansa ngunit hindi ito ang unang dahilan mas nakakaapekto pa ang laganap na corruption sa ating bayan, pilit lang kasi nilang dinidivert ang mga madla upang mapagtakpan ang kanilang pagkakamali… besides kasalanan ba ng bata na siya ay naging panlima or so on and so forth… di ba hindi naman wala lang naging control at sapat na kaalaman ang kanyang mga magulang kung kayat siya ay naging panlima… di populasyon ang problema, sadyang gobyerno lang talaga ang basura… i really wonder kung ano na ang mangyayari sa ating bayan, kawawa ang mga juan dela cruz ng hinaharap…

    Reply
  7. phil008

    do you really think being over populated is the problem of our country. well i mean look at china. how come that they are about to compete with first world countries. i think the problem is on the government itself. they don’t even know how to implement other laws and now they are blaming over population. and even created this bill which will cause dilemma.

    Reply
  8. tangent_abs

    A lot of people against RH Bill says that it is against moral values. How can this be immora?It clearly states that abortion is still illegal..tell us, how do you define moral? Is keeping Filipinos from educating themselves with the issue moral? A lot of those against the bill talks about morality like they really knew it.
    I am a nursing student, my knowledge about laws and bills may be mediocre compared to others commenting here, but this I know, each individual has different biological mechanisms. Natural family planning is preferred by anti-RH’s, but this is not applicable to all women for not all women have regular menstrual periods.I know that Philippines is predominantly a Christian country, but we must not be blinded from the reality that overpopulation is becoming one of the serious problems of the country.

    Reply
  9. cyrenefaith

    DOESN”T THIS BILL MAKE YOU PUKE?!

    Think about your children and your childrens children, enjoying their sexual rights (freedom to choose with whom, when, where, how to have sex with).

    Overpopulation is not the mere issue here. It’s about morality, dignity and integrity.

    So if you would like to get ovarian and uterine complications due to contaceptives coz it’s what you think is great for controlling the country’s population, so be my guest.

    If you would like to have your 12yr-old daughter or son bringing a guy/girl with her at home straight to their room and you can’t do anything about it because you would be jailed for 6 months and/or fined from P10,000-P50,000 be my guest.

    kung hindi parin kayo kumbinsido roon,
    Isipin niyo naman ang “TUNAY NA HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN”.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.