Some Filipinos want and do get married outside the Philippines. There’s nothing really strange with this, except when they say that the reason is for convenience in getting a divorce abroad. This is strange for two main reasons:
[See also: Process of Judicial Recognition of a Foreign Divorce Decree and Mixed Marriages and Divorce: When One Spouse is a Foreigner, Divorce is Recognized even if Initiated by the Filipino Spouse]
1. Divorce is not recognized under Philippine laws. If you’re a Filipino, it doesn’t matter where you get a divorce: such divorce is invalid/void in the Philippines. This is because under the nationality principle (Art. 15, Civil Code), all Filipinos – where they may be in the world – are bound by Philippine laws on family rights and duties, status, condition, and legal capacity. Yes, folks, you can run, but you can’t hide.Nevertheless, divorce decrees secured outside the Philippines are recognized in certain instances. This is provided in Article 26 (Paragraph 2) of the Family Code, which reads in full:
ART. 26. All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines in accordance with the laws in force in the country where they were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also be valid in this country, except those prohibited under Articles 35(1), (4), (5) and (6), 36, 37 and 38.
Where a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall have capacity to remarry under Philippine law.
The twin elements for the application of this provision are:
- 1. There is a valid marriage that has been celebrated between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner; and
- 2. A valid divorce is obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry.
After complying with the procedure in having the foreign decree of divorce judicially recognized (through a court action) here in the Philippines, the Filipino spouse may validly remarry.
At first glance, Article 26 seems to apply only to a marriage between a Filipino and a foreigner. This was raised by a respected commentator in family law, Justice Sempio-Diy, who noted that Art. 26 does not apply:
…to a divorce obtained by a former Filipino who had been naturalized in another country after his naturalization, as it might open the door to rich Filipinos’ obtaining naturalization abroad for no other reason than to be able to divorce their Filipino spouse (Handbook on the Family Code of the Philippines, 1995 Ed., p. 30).
However, this provision was later interpreted by the Supreme Court to include cases involving parties who, at the time of the celebration of the marriage were Filipino citizens, but later on, one of them becomes naturalized as a foreign citizen and obtains a divorce decree. The reckoning point is not the citizenship of the parties at the time of marriage, but their citizenship at the time a valid divorce is obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating the latter to remarry. (Philippines vs. Orbecido III, G.R. No. 154380, 5 October 2005).
2. Marriage is supposed to be forever. From an idealistic non-legal standpoint, the sole reason for marriage should be love; the kind of love that transcends time and withstands any impediments that life throws our way. From a legal perspective, on the other hand, no less than the Philippine Constitution (Art. XV, Sec. 2) and the Family Code (Art. 1) expressly characterize marriage as the foundation of the family and an inviolable social institution. The law states that it is a special contract of a permanent union between a man and a woman (sorry, same sex marriage is not yet recognized in the Philippines). It is inviolable. It is permanent. In short, you don’t think of divorce when you get married.
History of Article 26, Family Code:
6 July 1987: President Corazon Aquino signed Executive Order No. 209, otherwise known as the “Family Code of the Philippines.” The law, which took effect on 3 August 1988, reads:
All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines in accordance with the laws in force in the country where they were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also be valid in this country, except those prohibited under Articles 35, 37, and 38.
17 July 1987: Executive Order No. 227 was signed into law, amending Article 26 of the Family Code, among others. Article 26 now reads:
ART. 26. All marriages solemnized outside the Philippines in accordance with the laws in force in the country where they were solemnized, and valid there as such, shall also be valid in this country, except those prohibited under Articles 35(1), (4), (5) and (6), 36, 37 and 38.
Where a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall have capacity to remarry under Philippine law.
- Twin-Notice Rule and Procedural Requirements in Employment Termination Proceedings - June 3, 2020
- When Travel Pass is Needed for Interzonal Travel during Community Quarantine - June 1, 2020
- Can Companies Compel Employees to Work during the General Community Quarantine (GCQ) and Impose Disciplinary Sanctions - May 29, 2020
how can i file an annulment to my wife? we have no kids and we are separated almost a year now. i need some answers and i need your advice.she always reminds me to file an annulment,we usually argue on financial matters. thanx
Ian Boy/Venus,
Please read the “Terms” – no legal advice is given in this site.
Nevertheless, the fact of separation or abandonment – no matter how long – is not a gound for annulment. At most, abandonment may only be a ground for legal separation. When you talk to your lawyer, he/she will be better able to discuss the grounds for annulment and decide on the ground/s to invoke based on the facts you tell him/her (or if there’s no basis).
As to presumtive death, this topic will be discussed in a new post.
hi,
im a filipina, and but separated for more than 8 yrs now.but with no communication eventhough we have a daughter, 13 yrs old now. we didn’t get any financial support from the day he left..in short, it’s life he has abandoned us. we never change address and telephone no.i have a bf now, a us citizen but filipino . we want to make our relationship legal. is it possible for me to declare my ex husband as dead or presumed dead? so that i won’t be needing to file an annulment and get married soon?? pls give me an advice..thanks in advance..
ei, i would like to inquire how a divorce decree can be recognized here in the Phils. what steps do i have to take for the divorce to be recognized? is filing with the NSO enough or do i have to file for a declaratory relief? do i still have to retain the services of the attorney abroad who fixed the divorce or can everything be done here? as a non-bar person, what can i do? i’m sorry for all the questions but your help will be very much appreciated… thank you so much…
A declaratory relief is needed. You don’t have to retain the services of your foreigner-attorney, but you have to discuss the requirements with your lawyer here in the Philippines. He can tell you what documents are needed to be presented in court.
hi atty fred,
i have an ongoing annulment case. i cane across the comelec list of voters in the internet and found out that the other woman is now using my husband’s surname. i am trying to find out if they were officially married.
my husband converted to islam when he decided to have another woman. we were both catholics when we got married. granting that he is now a muslim and should i find out that they got married, can i file for bigamy?
In my case, I am a filipino citizen leaving in US, I filed for a divorce here in US. My husband is a Filipino but naturalized as a US citizen since 1970 or so. He is still a US citizen. He went back to the Phils in 1999 and I filed for a divorce in 2004, does that mean that we are not legally divorce? or we are still married per say to each other even though my divorce was final and was sent to him.
After the divorce decree, he remarried. Am i still a married woman? and he is still my husband legally? I am confused. what is the status of both of us after the divorce decree since divorce is not valid in the Phils.
Blu2luv, if you’ve gone through this article, as well as the related topics in this site, you’ll note that Article 26 of the Family Code is clear that the exception applies only when the foreigner-spouse (or the former Filipino spouse) secures the divorce. Still, this is not a legal advice; we’re not allowed to give any in this Forum. Good luck.
Atty. Fred,
i was just so confused cause i was married to a filipino before i married to a US citizen. i was married to filipino with a different spelling of my name and the middle initial. then i was married to a US citizen in my real birth name. i didnt get any papers from NSO that i was married before so when i filed a Proof of singleness, i got one that says that I was never been married. so me and the US citizen got married in the philippines with the judge. so now my american husband he lied to everybody he used my past as his ground for filing a divorce cause he just said that i was just used him he told everybody that im still married in the Philippines he said i have a secret to him its very hurting but i know he can do everything what he want cause he said hes gonna use all his power and now he got the paper that saying that i was married in the philippines before him i just wondering how he got it cause i went to NSO so many times to get my own papers but i never got one. Yes, he got one but its just different spelling of my name. so i just wanted to know if this is still acceptable or just the same when it comes to legal matters cause i have all my original papers that we’r married and the original proof of singleness and i also got the receipts of all the papers i got from NSO cause he said all are coin jobs. plsss help me. thank you
eiruj03, here’s my dilemma. In order to effectively address your concerns, I have to ask some questions. However, I can’t go analyzing your problem, asking more questions and giving an opinion – we’re prohibited from doing so. I really hope you understand.